Sunday, February 22, 2009

How to Cook Everything Vegetarian: Crackers

Very stoked about Heath Ledger's Oscar win. Not so stoked about Mark Bittman's crackers. They were like a stale tortilla torn into random pieces, chewy and raggedy and kind of lame. Occasionally Mark Bittman is a bit too casual, but we can cut him some slack. After all, he's trying to tell us how to cook everything. I just don't feel this basic cracker recipe was his highest priority.

Problems: First, he says to roll the dough (flour, butter, water, salt) to 1/4 inch thick. But crackers need to be incredibly thin -- you know, wafer thin -- and anything close to 1/4 inch is too chunky. I rolled my crackers much, much thinner. Then he calls for baking at 400 for 10 minutes which barely warms even skinny crackers. 

It's kind of exciting to try to recreate a ubiquitous, taken-for-granted foodstuff you've always purchased in a box. I decided to compare the King Arthur Baker's Companion recipe, as one would think crackers would be a priority in a flour company company cookbook.

And so they were, though King Arthur mysteriously omits salt. I corrected this oversight. They properly advise rolling the dough to 1/16 of an inch, cutting in shapes, and baking for 25 minutes at 350. See tidy, superior crackers at left.

We had a lot of crackers.

Here's the crazy thing. I can't sell cookies or cake around here to save my life, but my children devoured the crackers, both kinds of crackers. It's hokey to gush about how much your kids loved a dish, but: oh well. Isabel ate maybe a dozen crackers. Owen had friends over and they ate crackers like popcorn while screening the 12 Farts of Christmas on YouTube.

Good times. 

1 comment:

  1. Clearly there was quite possibly an empty room or space, the place an individual gem were disregarded for fake chanel any opportunity 84 gaps (40 regarding every one edge within the rotor), doubtless that will give a, quite possibly multitude to your advertisers to encourage. This end user deception was not able to survive, even so it was initially mainly during 1974 that this visited a conclusion, as soon as the World Agency meant for fake rolex Standardisation (ISO) circulated the standard which unfortunately flatly stopped providers with together with all non-functional jewels on their advertisements or simply sales and profits plans. The couldn't avoid providers with breaking any confine for important jewels (which unfortunately amplified that will related to 30 when using the enhancement for rolex replica uk self-winding pieces during the 1950s, and also amplified the nature within the exercise they will demanded), even so it has got ensured that your commercialized jewels tend to be the bare minimum gem bearings, and without doubt wouldn't contain a harmful affect any see. Any proxy for daily life the fact that gem bearings iwc replica uk delivers mechanized pieces has already established a good profound benefit in him or her. Not anymore happen to be aged pieces an inferior system; one is certainly wearing out. Utilizing usual checking, a good mechanized see may well go for hundreds of years not having dropping consistency

    ReplyDelete